Rectal cancer restaging using 3D CUBE vs. 2D T2-weighted technique after neoadjuvant therapy: a diagnostic study

OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the accuracy of rectal cancer restaging after neoadjuvant therapy with 3D CUBE sequence with 2D T2-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) sequence. METHODS This retrospective study comprised 72 patients with rectal cancer confirmed by colonoscopy and biopsy. After neoadjuvant therapy, all patients underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination at 1.5T MRI sequences including a single coronal 3D CUBE T2-weighted FSE sequence with 1.4 mm thickness and a 2D T2-weighted FSE sequence in the sagittal, coronal and axial planes with 5 mm thickness. The total acquisition time of the two sequences was recorded. Results were compared with postsurgical pathology (gold standard). The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated; and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curves (AUC) were calculated. RESULTS The T category staging accuracy of 3D T2WI and 2D T2WI was 81.9% and 72.2%, respectively, for reviewer 1 and 86.1% and 75.0% for reviewer 2. The AUC of 3D was higher than that of 2D (0.878 vs. 0.783 for reader 1 and 0.905 vs. 0.796 for reader 2; both P < 0.05) when judging whether the tumor broke through the muscle layer. There was no significant difference between 3D and 2D in judging whether lymph nodes were malignant (AUC 0.719 vs. 0.698 for reader 1 and 0.740 vs. 0.698 for reader 2; both P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the visibility of the rectal wall layer, tumor lesion and the overall image quality (all P > 0.05). Compared with 2D sequences, the 3D sequence had shorter acquisition time and higher signal intensity ratio (both P < 0.05). CONCLUSION 3D CUBE T2-weighted sequences offer better diagnostic accuracy in rectal cancer restaging after neoadjuvant therapy when compared with 2D T2-weighted FSE sequences; it has a shorter scanning time and more versatility of orientation reconstruction.